Saturday, September 4, 2010

有時候就該小題大作



新聞應該把焦點聚集在真正需要討論的議題上,而不只是完全執著於八卦,醜聞,與政治角力的垃圾話題。
在一個週末晚上,我難得看到一則值得探索與討論的事件,卻被媒體草率地帶過。

如果你沒有看新聞(即使我覺得,任何不注意社會大事的成年人實在不值得被任何人認真對待),今晚有媒體報導位於台北市敦化南路的環宇通商大樓管委會在主委,住戶,與警方的率領下強制位於其大樓頂層的印度神廟立刻遷離。可惜,呈現出來的新聞報導並沒有深入得探討背後的議題,而觀眾只看到一群異國人士被驅離他們追求信仰的場所。老實說,這畫面讓我很憤怒,因為我們自己對文化與信仰的包容性,應該比這報導所表現出來的更好。

等等,真的是這樣嗎? 還是台灣人民掛在嘴邊的多元性與包容性,只是一個空虛的原則,就像小學生都知道被問到:玩耍前是不是該把功課先做完? 相信每個小孩,就算做不到,也都知道回答{是}。

不過我並非完全否認大廈委員會想要遷離印度神廟的權利。只是委員會的理由絕對不可以,更不應該是因為印度教徒的習俗與穿著。請參考UDN的引據:

管委會召開區分所有權人會議,決議禁止住戶在大樓從事宗教活動,但神壇不理會,管委會才提告要求強制遷離(http://udn.com/NEWS/SOCIETY/SOC6/5767078.shtml)。

的確,根據公寓大廈管理條例,管委會有權制定住戶在大樓內需遵守的相關規定,如有違反規定者,由管理負責人或管理委員會促請其改善,於三個月內仍未改善者,管理負責人或管理委員會得依區分所有權人會議之決議,訴請法院強制其遷離(內政部營建署:http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10472&Itemid=57)。

但是前提是不可違反憲法,否則無效。而仔細想一想,如果就{轄區}而言,還有比憲法更清楚,更直接保障人民權益的嗎?

中華民國憲法第十三條清楚寫著{人民有信仰宗教之自由}。第十四條{人民有集會及結社之自由}。中華民國行政院新聞局:http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=13370&CtNode=904&mp=1#14

而如果你認為中華民國憲法只保障中華民國公民的話,那麼請設想,如果今天一個信仰一貫道的台灣人到美國居住,但並沒有公民身分,但是他卻還是固定的跟隨當地的華人一起去康乃狄克州參加道教聚會,那麼他該被遣返嗎?順道一提,我的確認是這個人。

答案是否定的,因為就算美國憲法第一條例就明文規定"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances," 但是美國政府以及大多數人民都有足夠的認知去容忍在美國的領土上,任何"人"的信仰與言論自由是需受尊重的,不管有多怪異,只要不危害到他人安全。

所以,如果大廈管委會要將印度神廟遷離,那麼前提只能是因為該神廟已對社區居住品質(如空氣污染,噪音汙染等)或居民安全(如竊盜,騷擾等)。而不只是因為一個悲哀的理由,{每天來來去去都是印度人,一天來拜拜的人至少在二、三十人,若遇到辦大型法會,人數更超過上百人,住戶十分不習慣,老弱婦孺看了也很害怕)。 參考UDN連結閱讀原文

更不應該讓露出的畫面只是一個求好心切,但無知的管委拿著區區的大樓公約當法律,在警方的仗勢之下,驅逐這群印度人。

不過,剝去法律的責任,我想或許這裡最敏感的一根神經應該是恐懼。更清楚的說,是人民對自己不懂的人事物,所產生的恐懼。

但是,不爭的事實是世界太小太小了。金錢,物資,訊息,文化,都以前所未見的速度跟頻率相互交集與碰撞。所以如果台北,甚至台灣自認是個國際化的地方,那麼首都的人民與全國的人民也應該勇於理解與包容不同的文化(自己國內的原住民文化就是個好的起點)。我們可以不認同,但是我們不應該因為恐懼而排斥,更不能因為這個悲哀的理由而歧視。

今天這只是一間大廈的糾紛,但是如果台北因為國際化而有著越來越多外國居民,如果台北出現越來越多的猶太教,摩門教,回教信徒,那我們該怎麼回應? 把所有人趕出去,讓寶島成為永遠的孤島嗎? 如果我們每天吵著要加入聯合國,成為國際社會的一份子,那我們也應該培養世界公民需有的基本素質。

如果,今天那棟大樓的頂層是個傳統的台灣神壇呢? 我們還會有著一樣的反應嗎?

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Happy Birthday




Dad went through gastrectomy and had half of his stomach removed.

But believe it or not, this has been a birthday to remember, in a good way.

For all the presents in the world, for all the fame and fortune, I'd trade it all in a heartbeat just to keep my loved ones healthy and happy.

Watching my dad recover every day, I'm happy to say "thank you" to whom ever answered my prayer.

This birthday, I've come to understand the true meaning of "birthdays;" celebrate those who gives your life meaning.

Thank you, all my dear friends who took the time to let me know I'm on your thoughts today. I'm touched and humbled.

Thank you, Dad, for putting up a good fight and winning, this birthday's for you. I'm not just proud of you, I'm proud to be your son.

Friday, August 13, 2010

What's Cookin'?



Well, you learn something new everyday.

So recently, I've been reading up on an article about the 2013 solar storm my friend Jason posted on his Facebook page.

Nope, there wasn't a typo. It really is "2013." Unlike what most of the debate surrounding the 2012 global disaster, NASA scientist have issued a mild, but nonetheless, cautious warning about a more likely scenario that needs our attention. Basically, if I understood correctly, the sun will vent out its solar energy in a solar flare when the next solar cycle peaks, that would be during 2013. When that happens, radiation and solar particles and lots of other things with long confusing names will be coughed right onto the face of mother Earth.

Since, well, ALL of civilization depends on computers and satellites, there will definitely be a huge unavoidable effect. But is it Armageddon? Well NASA is saying no, but that's never going to stop the doomsday-sayers is it?

So I thought it'd be interesting to learn a bit about our long-time neighbor, the sun. With that, I share with you the transcript on NASA's public discussion session , hosted in June, about everything related to the Sun. Mind you, it's long and text-heavy, so I'll just paste the first segment, if you want the whole tuna, follow the link.

On another note, if you aren't following NASA's Tweets or Facebook, you really should. It's full of unbelievable stuff. I'm not Stephen Hawkins, but I don't want to be Fred Flintstone either, you know? Have fun learning!








Ask an Expert: Our Powerful Sun06.17.10

Eight planets and their moons, tens of thousands of asteroids, and trillions of comets revolve around the sun. One of these is our Earth, orbiting the sun at an average distance of about 92,960,000 miles (149,600,000 kilometers). The sun is a huge, glowing ball that provides light, heat, and other energy to our Earth. But our beneficial space neighbor is also capable of some stellar "temper tantrums."

On Thursday, June 17, Dr. David Hathaway, a solar scientist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, answered your questions about how our sun works and produces phenomena such as sunspots, solar flares, and solar storms -- "hot' topics that have communication and health implications for everyone on Earth.

Check back on this page on Monday for a complete transcript of today's chat.

More About Chat Expert David Hathaway

Dr. Hathaway received his doctorate in Astrophysics from the University of Colorado in Boulder, CO in 1979. He worked for two years as a Post-Doctoral Fellow in the Advanced Study Program at the National Center for Atmospheric Research before taking a 3-year position as an Assistant Astronomer at the National Solar Observatory site in Sunspot, NM. He came to NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL in 1984 where he has been a member of the solar physics group and served as its team leader from 1996 to 2010. He has written over 150 articles on the Sun and solar physics and has received three US patents. He has been the recipient of dozens of awards from within NASA and from the broader scientific community. Hathaway has served on numerous advisory committees as well as elected positions within scientific organizations.

Dr. Hathaway’s primary research interests include the nature and origin of the sunspot cycle and the fluid dynamics of the Sun’s interior. His research includes constructing computer models for flows on the surface of the Sun and analysis programs for extracting those flows from satellite observations. He maintains a database on sunspots, including their sizes and positions, that extends back to the year 1874. This database is widely used by the solar physics community. Data plots, images, and animations produced by Dr. Hathaway are also widely used in many publications by both his scientific colleagues and the scientific press.

Chat Transcript

(Moderator) Jason: Today's Chat is Scheduled to Begin at 3pm ET. Please begin to ask your questions by typing them into the box at the bottom of the screen and clicking the 'Ask' button on the right. We'll begin answering them in twenty minutes. Thanks for your patience.

(Moderator) Jason: Hello everyone. Our chat will begin momentarily. Please begin to ask your questions by typing them into the box at the bottom of the screen and clicking the 'Ask' button on the right. We'll begin answering them in a few minutes. Thanks for your patience.

Abishek: Can suns rays reach how more long than Pluto?

David: The sun's rays can reach 4.5 billion light years. Pluto is only three light hours from the sun.

Akarsh_Valsan: Sir, can you explain the major composition of the Sun?

David: The sun is composed of 70% hydrogen, 28% helium, and 2% carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. This is the composition it was born with from the cloud of gas that it came from long ago.

chaosx: What truly is going to happen during our next solar cycle in 2013. Will it knock out much of the electronics in certain areas of the world?

David: The next solar cycle by most indications will be the weakest in 100 years. We also have satellites and other technology that can help us mitigate the problems associated with flares. However, so much of our technology is sensitive to space weather. We need better predictions and radiation-hardened electronic components.

abishek: Can aurora borealis seen from the earth?

David: Aurora borealis are formed when energetic particles from the sun stream down the Earth's magnetic field lines into the polar regions. It can be seen after many significant solar flares. We just had one last weekend.

g00nne: Hello, I wrote today, the message is probably lost somewhere. Can you tell me some information about the galactic Wednesday and consequent eruption of the Sun 2013? Thank you for your reply.

David: The next solar cycle should reach its peak in mid-2013. Again, we're expecting the weakest solar cycle in 100 years, so the effects should be less than what we've seen in the last few solar cycles.

nomaanakhtar: Do solar flares produce solar winds?

David: Solar flares are huge explosions on the surface of the sun. They typically last anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours and can blast a billion tons of matter off of the sun. The solar wind is something altogether different. The solar wind blows off of the sun at all times, with typical speeds of about 1 million mph. We still don't know exactly what causes the solar wind, but we know that it's related to the sun's 1 million degree corona, or outer atmosphere.

Feign: Does the increase of solar flares happen approximately once a decade, and is this increase in flares any different from previous times?

David: The frequency of solar flares rises and falls with the sunspot cycle, which is about 11 years long. The bigger cycles have more flares than the smaller cycles. Nonetheless, a small cycle can produce a really nasty flare!

Feign: Is a large solar flare capable of destroying life on Earth?

David: No. :) The sun has been producing solar flares for 4.5 billion years, and we're still here.

prat: I read that earth's magnetic field is protection us from solar flares. Is it true? ANd how does it protect? What is the actual phenomena?

David: Yes, that's true. The energetic particles produced by solar flares are electrically charged particles that are diverted by magnetic fields. We're also protected by our atmosphere which blocks all but the most energetic particles.

Adam: Hello Jason and David. My question related to solar variability. I'm interested to hear David Hathaway's opinion on the effect that solar variability has on the climate here on Earth. There is a school of thought amongst climate change skeptics that the warming experienced on Earth over the last 150/200 years can be attributed to an increase in solar activity and I am wondering whether David believes that this idea fits the data. Thanks for your time.

David: There do appear to be connections between solar activity and climate. The sun is actually 0.1 % brighter at sunspot cycle maximum than at minimum, but this should only produce about 1/10 degree C change in temperature. The apparent effect is larger than this, but we don't know the exact connection. One possibility is that the sun's ultraviolet light, which varies by 3-4% at sunspot cycle maximum, might influence the Earth's upper atmosphere. Another possibility is cosmic rays, which have higher fluxes at sunspot cycle minimum might produce clouds. We still don't know the full answer on this, but our best estimates are that the sun's contribution to global warming plays a minor role.

nomaan: What are solar flares?

David: Solar flares are explosions produced by twisted magnetic fields in the sun's atmosphere. They produce the energy equivalent of about 1 million megatons of TNT.

nyswimmer: How hot is the sun?

David: The sun is 5,770 degree Kelvin or about 10,000 degrees F at the surface, but it has temperatures of tens of millions of degrees in its core where hydrogen is being converted into helium.

(Moderator) Jason: We're working to get through all of the great questions you've asked us. Keep them coming! To submit your own question, please type it in the box at the bottom of the window and click the 'Ask' button on the right side of the box. Thanks for your patience as we answer your questions.

Friday, August 6, 2010

當世界短兵相接



武器的演變,往往有著比實際破壞力更大的政治牽動力。

核武就是最鮮明的例子之一;從伊朗到北韓,這些政權之所以在國際間能夠引起憂慮,能夠以武力威脅換取談判籌碼,就是因為擁有核武的嚇阻,或是開發核武的意圖,甚至光是研發核能的動作就足以讓世界大國之間弩張劍拔。也因此,再貧瘠,落後的國家只要有能力,便會把握這條登上世界牌局,與強國平起同坐的捷徑,進而實現愛因斯坦的夢靨。

而並不受到國際公約所限制研發的航空母艦,乍聽之下沒有核武那麼具有威脅性,但是其戰略與政治價值卻不分上下,也是美國之所以能成為世界強國的要素之一。航空母艦象徵的是海上的堡壘,而誰擁有這個堡壘,或是最多最強大的堡壘,也理所當然的將稱霸汪洋大海。或許大家會認為飛彈的存在已取代這樣的武器運用,但事實卻相反。航母往往不會單獨行動,畢竟保壘也有護城河,它往往是搭配著戰艦的護航,形成一個海上坦克。在第一次世界大戰的戰場上,坦克的出現與運用永久改變了戰場上的戰術,而航空母艦對海上戰役的影響也如此深遠。

擁有最強大的航母群的美國海軍也因此是美軍最壯碩的肌肉。如兩次進攻波斯灣的例子就可看出,美軍致命的攻勢往往分為三波;第一波為導彈轟炸,第二波為戰機轟炸,第三波為地面部隊進攻並地毯式殲滅敵人。而前兩波攻勢,往往都需要航母及其艦隊的支援。

但是,而這是個語重心長的【但是】,近日中國所研發的東風-21D導彈已成功的對航空母艦造成威脅,進而嚴重撼動到美軍在海上的龍頭地位。當東風在未來一兩年完成最後的修改,其所帶來的危脅,將與航母不分上下。它不但有能力嚇阻美軍進入或接近中國台灣附近的海域,更可能因為中東其他國家開始與日俱增的向北京購買武器而廣泛被使用,在其他地區構成更大的威脅。而政治力量,也因此在這時成為軍事的真正作用。

不管是反美還是挺美的人都不能,也不該否認美國是這個不完美的世界所能擁有的最接近完美的世界警察。因此,當警察的公權力或是嚇阻力受到質疑與化解時,混亂的狀態可想而知,我想這個台灣人是最清楚不過的。

台灣自古處在戰略優勢位置,也因此在美中台三角關係中握有一絲絲的心理屏障,但是台海的保護早已被瓦解(還記得台海危機嗎?),因此台灣的領導者,不分藍綠,勢必需要更宏觀的策略來面對這樣的威脅。

世界的薄冰從此更多了一點,台灣不再需要為了民主而爭吵,而更該為了永續生存而團結,不要讓中華民國的主權跟北極熊一樣面臨絕種。

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

盡在不言中

一個難忘的畫面,勝過千言萬語。

這是我們都懂的道理,更是從事創意行銷這個行業的人,常常所追求的黃金片段。但是我想,沒有看到那令人停止呼吸的畫面前,是無法體會的。

今天在新聞上,看到大連外海漏油的報導,雖然這場災害已發生一段時間,但是看到攝影師捕捉到罹難工作人員全身被石油覆著的屍體,頓時感觸良多。因此,在此跟大家分享一些我認為非常有意義的圖片。我不是攝影內行,但我想欣賞,憐憫與感動是人的本性。而一個好圖片的價值,更在於它是否牽動人心。希望有所啟發。


1. 這個眾所皆知的科學家,無需多做介紹。不過,與其說他是數理天才,從他的眼神就可看出他其實更是個熱愛生命的好奇頑童。



2. 1985年國家地理雜誌封面照。當時外界對於飽受戰亂折磨的阿富汗一無所知。圖中少女名為Sharbat Gula,當時12歲,是個難民營中的學生。她美麗的雙眸,充滿著無奈與絕望。



3. 2008年普立茲攝影獎作品。圖為居住在約旦河西岸的一民猶太婦女,單獨抵擋以色列部隊強制驅逐的畫面。還認為一個人的力量是薄弱的嗎?



4. 1995年普立茲攝影獎作品。一名飢餓的蘇丹兒童正爬向位於一公里外的聯合國糧食發放區。沒錯,後方的確是虎視眈眈的禿鷹。攝影師Kevin Carter三個月後因憂鬱症而自殺。



5. 蘇聯士兵在1945年攻陷柏林後象徵性的在德意志國會大樓頂端搖著國旗。當時聯軍從西方推進,蘇聯從東方夾擊反攻德國。



6. 2001年911攻擊事件後,救難人員在曾經是世貿雙塔的廢墟中升起美國國旗。縱使美國人有時霸道,有時傲慢與無知,但正也是美國人的勇敢與永不放棄的精神使他們成為今日的世界強權。



7. 1945年普立茲獎得獎作品。圖中為1945年美軍陸戰隊在硫磺島擊退日軍,登上Suribachi山頂豎立國旗的歷史畫面。這張照片訴說著美軍的光榮與犧牲,但是也證實了戰爭是人性醜陋的極致。國旗象徵,不只是主權,而是民族的精神與榮耀,因為自由與民主不是先天賦予每個人的,而是前人用犧牲為我們所換取的。

面對鏡頭微笑容每個人都會,但是要捕捉赤裸的眼神,紀錄真實的故事,何其可貴。

Monday, April 19, 2010

公眾人物的無辜與無知


週日在吃飯時看到看到TVBS在播"台灣第一名嘴"小S與周玉蔻火藥味濃厚的對話時, 頓時覺得反胃. 但是今天看到一篇文章覺得很有道理.

原文: http://blog.udn.com/powerecho/3955061

我想起先黑人被控透過做公益自肥時, 新聞都沒有這麼關注, 而是在小S與周玉蔻的對罵之後, 這個話題似乎才成了真正的熱門話題. 首先該記取教訓的就是說話遊走在刻薄與犀利之間遊走的小S. 原本這個話題, 可以因為黑人飽受委屈掉下的眼淚, 讓公眾以一個同情的眼光看待, 而給予諒解的空間也相對多一點. 但是卻在小S的電話之後, 轉為一個實際的角度, 用一個現實的尺度去衡量黑人的出發點與動機, 而能容忍的空間也理所當然的大大減少. 這就是所謂的"越描越黑".

這不是在欺負黑人, 而是現實就是如此. 這就是公眾人物必須承受, 也應該承受的壓力. 從政客到演藝明星, 身為公眾人物有著許多藉由知名度而獲取的利益, 但是相對的也有一定的責任. 其中一樣就是必須接受大眾用顯微鏡的方式觀察自己的生活.

你可以說這是人類為滿足最原始的偷窺慾望而捏造的藉口, 但是卻也是因為公眾人物本身就賦予著某種程度的公信力, 號召力, 因此大眾理所當然的有權利透徹的了解他們. 這是遊戲的規則, 畢竟無論是政客或是明星, 造就他們的人然是成千上萬,默默無名的"大眾".

如果完全歸咎於台灣的媒體生態, 那也不"完全"正確. 我絕非法律專家, 但是在美國, 在蓄意毀謗的相關案件上, 法庭衡量一般民眾與公眾人物, 有著鮮明且極大的差距. 除非有著明顯以及實質的證據指出公眾人物被蓄意及充滿惡意的謠言攻擊, 否則留給公眾自由討論的空間是很大的.

更何況, 今天黑人的Love Life潮T爭議最大的問題其實不是被懷疑自肥, 而是這個慈善行動的背後沒有一個清楚透明資金流向架構與機制來讓大眾了解自己的愛心是如何分配的. 就像王尚智的文章所述, 黑人的確"無辜", 但他的無辜源自於"無知".

透過大眾募集而來的慈善基金, 去向與內容理應公開給大眾知道, 而不是單純地認為不提錢就保持清白的想法. 相反的, 正因為這是黑人所發起的公益行動, 所以他更應該比誰都清楚款項的用途. 再加上, 當吸引大家行善的媒介是個商品, 這其中必然會變的複雜一些, 而募集的款項分配更應該清楚. 前幾年, Nike跟Live Strong基金會曾經轟動一時的黃色手環就是相似的例子, 正因為販售手環而得取的基金有著透明妥善的管理與分配, 所以沒有類似Love Life的爭議.

除此之外, 當小S充滿江湖味的為黑人挺身而出, 大戰"邪惡"的周玉蔻時, 演藝圈似乎令人感動的凝聚起來, 為自己的一份子打抱不平, 為想做善事就飽受委屈的黑人大喊不平. 這時, 該慚愧的是我們...

是嗎? 真是如此嗎? 這群"可憐"的明星們似乎網了演藝圈的真性. 虛實難辨, 是非不明, 這就是演藝人吸引眼光的地方, 也是令大眾存以疑慮的地方. 能怪我們嗎? 國內外有多少明星建立了自己的慈善基金會, 卻又不了了之? 章子怡的賑災基金便是個好例子. 難免要懷疑, 在慈善可以抵稅的前提下, 有多少的慈善基金真正的, 屹立不搖的在持續下去. 或許這對黑人不公平, 更似乎是提前斷定了他的罪, 但是身為滿資深的演藝圈人士, 他不應該天真的認為自己會不一樣. "天在做, 人在看"絕對不適合演藝圈.

我其實並非懷疑黑人的出發點, 他有能力也有意願, 已經比許多人偉大. 爭議的根本從來不是黑人私吞款項, 而是在於Love Life的透明性與經營. 所以黑人也不必用委屈的眼淚來博取同情, 小S也不用自以為是的伸張正義, 明星們也不用在自認不平.

黑人的出發點令人欽佩, 但方式卻草率, 面對公益這種依賴人性的善良的行為, 自然必須面對輿論的審判. 現在黑人能做的, 就是第一時間收起眼淚, 像個男人一樣坦承自己的愛心有餘, 經驗不足. 只要能立刻透明化, 不在躲在眼淚後面, 才能真正的化解這場信用危機.

危機處理的原則判定留給輿論去發酵的時間越長, 對形象信用的傷害就越難以挽回. 黑人還要哭多久?

Thursday, April 15, 2010

幸福的無奈


愛情是場戰爭.

兩個"相愛"的人, 在你一句我一句"我愛你"之間, 爭奪著誰到底愛誰多一點的地位. 其實沒有人願意被愛得少一點, 即使再怎麼願意為那個人付出所有. 人都是自私的, 遇到愛情這樣的相處模式, 等號兩邊更不可能會是平等的.

屬老虎, 又是獅子座的我, 有著比天高的自信與尊嚴, 在工作與人生的戰場上總是給我許多勇氣去克服種種障礙. 偏偏在愛情這一關輸得落花流水. 我愛的女孩, 明明比我矮小, 卻怎麼就是打不倒.

女人是傲慢高貴的貓, 因為你們總是愛理不理我們, 卻又讓我們沒辦法不理你們. 只有在心血來潮或是大發慈悲的時候才會撒嬌一下.好男人像隻笨笨的鬥牛犬, 頭腦簡單得我們總是天真的認為我們才是老大, 裝出一副萬夫莫敵的樣子, 卻又敗給那隻嬌小傲慢的貓. 叫的再怎麼兇, 碰到她, 什麼都沒用.

在這裡我奉勸所有男人三個字, "算了吧"! 想要追求愛情的平等的話, 那麼你只能滿足於假象了, 你可以盡情的想像要怎麼理直氣壯的大聲告訴她: 女人, 還我尊嚴! 但是只要她一笑, 只要她眼睛一泛紅, 鐵打的都會變成豆腐心. 所以呢, 當你牽著她的時候提醒一下自己. 要幸福, 就別計較太多了.

女人呢, 切記切記. 男人只要你哄一哄, 不要戳破我們大男人的美夢, 那麼我們就會一輩子做個忠實的笨狗, 永遠守護你. 我們竟然把你們當成皇后, 那也請把我們當成國王.

這是一場永不停息的戰爭, 有時候她讓我抓狂, 氣到炸, 火到要把我的拳頭吞下去. 但是她只要對我笑一笑, 我卻又覺得是全世界最幸福的笨蛋. 自信的我告訴自己, 她也一樣想我, 一樣掛念我. 但是想想現在在家無牽無掛看電視的是她, 再看看現在對著電腦掏心掏肺的我, 你覺得這場戰爭到底誰會勝出?

算了吧, 誰叫我愛她?